Radeon R5 M420 vs GeForce GTS 250M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 780 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 4x more memory | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 320 | vs | 96 | 224 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 3,200 MHz | vs | 2,000 MHz | 60% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | vs | 16 GB/s | Around 3.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly better T-Rex score | 3,276.12 | vs | 3,271.42 | Almost the same | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M420 vs GeForce GTS 250M
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Features Key features of the Radeon R5 M420 vs GeForce GTS 250M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
