Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 M465

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 M465

Report a correction
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Slightly higher memory clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors

Features Key features of the Radeon R5 M465  vs GeForce 920M 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

Radeon R5 M465
16 GB/s
GeForce 920M
14.4 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R5 M465
8 GPixel/s
GeForce 920M
7.63 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R5 M465
24 GTexel/s
GeForce 920M
30.53 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R5 M465
768 GFLOPS
GeForce 920M
732.7 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

Radeon R5 M465  vs
GeForce 920M 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Meso GK208
Clock speed 1,000 MHz 954 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None Nvidia GeForce 920M 775 MHz 1 GB

raw performance

Shading units 384 384
Texture mapping units 24 32
Render output processors 8 16
Pixel rate 8 GPixel/s 7.63 GPixel/s
Texture rate 24 GTexel/s 30.53 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 768 GFLOPS 732.7 GFLOPS

memory

Radeon R5 M465  vs
GeForce 920M 
Memory clock speed 1,000 MHz 900 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 2,000 MHz 1,800 MHz
Memory bus 64 bit 64 bit
Memory 4,096 MB 2,048 MB
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Memory bandwidth 16 GB/s 14.4 GB/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus