Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GT 1030 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 1030 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 1030GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 730 MHz | Around 70% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,256 | vs | 966 | More than 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 1,468 MHz | vs | 780 MHz | Around 90% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 27.03 | vs | 10.89 | Around 2.5x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,617 | vs | 621 | More than 2.5x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,714.14 | vs | 1,769.8 | More than 2x better manhattan score | |||
Report a correction
