0 Comments
| Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GT 240 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon R7 240GPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 730 MHz | vs | 550 MHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
More shading units | 320 | vs | 96 | 224 more shading units | |||
Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 69W | 2.3x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 3,400 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 90% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | Around 90% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Slightly more texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more texture mapping units |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GT 240
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Radeon R7 240
966
GeForce GT 240
652
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 240
3,149.55
GeForce GT 240
3,688.23
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 240
9.62
GeForce GT 240
9.37
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Radeon R7 240
621
GeForce GT 240
638