GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 630 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.2

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R7 240 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 240  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
More shading units 320 vs 96 224 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 30W vs 65W 2.2x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 630

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GT 630

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,200 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 80% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 810 MHz vs 730 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 51.2 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 80% higher memory bandwidth

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GT 630

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus