GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 640 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.8

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R7 240 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 240  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R7 240

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R7 240

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 30W vs 65W 2.2x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 640

Reasons to consider the
Leadtek GeForce GT 640

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 902 MHz vs 730 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Better sky diver factor score 143.75 vs 102.46 More than 40% better sky diver factor score
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Slightly more texture mapping units 32 vs 20 12 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GT 640

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus