GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 730 among Desktop GPUs for under $200

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R7 240

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R7 240

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Front view of GeForce GT 730

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 730

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 902 MHz vs 730 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GT 730

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
So looks like the GT 730 is more performance and less budget oriented and the R7 240 is more budget focused
comments powered by Disqus