GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
Lower TDP 30W vs 75W 2.5x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,291 MHz vs 730 MHz More than 75% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 5,757 vs 966 Around 6x better PassMark score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 4x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 112.1 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 4x higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 41.3 GPixel/s vs 6.24 GPixel/s More than 6.5x higher pixel rate
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,392 MHz vs 780 MHz Around 80% higher turbo clock speed
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Much better fire strike factor score 51.07 vs 10.89 Around 4.8x better fire strike factor score
Better floating-point performance 1,983 GFLOPS vs 499.2 GFLOPS Around 4x better floating-point performance
Much higher memory clock speed 1,752 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 95% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 62 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel/s Around 4x higher texture rate
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 3,271 vs 621 More than 5.2x better PassMark direct compute score
More shading units 768 vs 320 448 more shading units
More texture mapping units 48 vs 20 28 more texture mapping units
Better T-Rex score 3,363.04 vs 3,149.55 More than 5% better T-Rex score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus