GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 550 Ti among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

AMD Radeon R7 240

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R7 240

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly lower TDP 30W vs 116W 3.9x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,104 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 98.5 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 3.5x higher memory bandwidth
Higher clock speed 900 MHz vs 730 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 1,926 vs 966 Around 2x better PassMark score
More render output processors 24 vs 8 Three times as many render output processors
Better sky diver factor score 136.02 vs 102.46 Around 35% better sky diver factor score
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus
Slightly more texture mapping units 32 vs 20 12 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 1,026 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed
Slightly better manhattan score 3,350.43 vs 1,769.8 Around 90% better manhattan score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute


comments powered by Disqus