GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 750 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 30W vs 55W More than 45% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 750

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 3,277 vs 966 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 730 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s More than 2.8x higher memory bandwidth
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 780 MHz Around 40% higher turbo clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,044.5 GFLOPS vs 499.2 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Better fire strike factor score 28.99 vs 10.89 Around 2.8x better fire strike factor score
Higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 6.24 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher texture rate 32.6 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,470 vs 621 More than 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly more shading units 512 vs 320 192 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 32 vs 20 12 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 750

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 240
3,149.55
GeForce GTX 750
3,351.5

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 240
1,769.8
GeForce GTX 750
1,745.62

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus