GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
Lower TDP 30W vs 60W 2x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 1,800 MHz 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 3,699 vs 966 More than 3.8x better PassMark score
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 730 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s More than 3x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel/s More than 5.2x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 1,728 GFLOPS vs 499.2 GFLOPS Around 3.5x better floating-point performance
Significantly better fire strike factor score 33.8 vs 10.89 More than 3x better fire strike factor score
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 780 MHz Around 40% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 6.24 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
More shading units 640 vs 320 Twice as many shading units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,830 vs 621 Around 3x better PassMark direct compute score
More texture mapping units 40 vs 20 Twice as many texture mapping units
Better manhattan score 3,702.15 vs 1,769.8 More than 2x better manhattan score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 240

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute


Showing 4 comments.
gtx 750ti work on 300 watt psu and is lik e4 time better than r7 240,i own an r7 240 1gb ddr5(don't even bother with ddr3 it's garbage)i overclocked it to 1100mhz bios flash,it's a good card for competitive gaming or cs go lol dota track mania 60fps ultra ect,or for display on high resolution not any kind of AAA game or new games or any solo game past 2014
"Winner AMD Radeon R7 240 GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 240 based on its NOISE and POWER." GPUBoss, you are crazy!!! LoL
Will say the geforce 750 ti is the better option
comments powered by Disqus