0 Comments
| Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon R7 240GPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 106W | 3.5x lower TDP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 3,608 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Slightly better PassMark score | 1,557 | vs | 966 | More than 60% better PassMark score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 57.73 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Better manhattan score | 3,689.87 | vs | 1,769.8 | More than 2x better manhattan score | |||
Slightly more texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more texture mapping units |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Radeon R7 240
966
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 240
3,149.55
GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card
3,356.98
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 240
1,769.8
GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card
3,689.87
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 240
10.89
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 240
102.46
GeForce GTX 750 Ti Fake Card
115.77
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 240
9.62