GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 760

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
Lower TDP 50W vs 130W 2.6x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 760

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 4,951 vs 963 Around 5.2x better PassMark score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 6.8x higher memory bandwidth
Higher clock speed 823 MHz vs 730 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,115.84 vs 2,106.22 Around 50% better manhattan score
Better floating-point performance 1,896 GFLOPS vs 467.2 GFLOPS More than 4x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 14.6 GTexel/s Around 5.5x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 19.8 GPixel/s vs 5.84 GPixel/s Around 3.5x higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 96 vs 20 76 more texture mapping units
Higher turbo clock speed 888 MHz vs 780 MHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 1,152 vs 320 832 more shading units
More render output processors 24 vs 8 Three times as many render output processors
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,338 vs 543 More than 4.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Better face detection score 33.98 mPixels/s vs 13.08 mPixels/s More than 2.5x better face detection score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs GeForce GTX 760

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)

Radeon R7 240
62.78 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 760
74.06 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Radeon R7 240
13.08 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 760
33.98 mPixels/s

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

Radeon R7 240
3,357.8
GeForce GTX 760
3,360.04

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

Radeon R7 240
2,106.22
GeForce GTX 760
3,115.84

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus