0 Comments
| Radeon R7 240 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 730 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | Around 30% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | Around 6.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,800 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly more shading units | 1,600 | vs | 320 | 1280 more shading units | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,600 GFLOPS | vs | 499.2 GFLOPS | Around 3.2x better floating-point performance | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 20 | 60 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher pixel rate | 16 GPixel/s | vs | 6.24 GPixel/s | More than 2.5x higher pixel rate | |||
More compute units | 20 | vs | 5 | 15 more compute units | |||
Slightly higher texture rate | 40 GTexel/s | vs | 15.6 GTexel/s | More than 2.5x higher texture rate | |||
Wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 128 bit | 4x wider memory bus |
Features Key features of the Radeon R7 240 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Radeon R7 240
28.8 GB/s
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2
179.2 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon R7 240
6.24 GPixel/s
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2
16 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon R7 240
15.6 GTexel/s
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2
40 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon R7 240
499.2 GFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2
1,600 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
Radeon R7 240
320
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R7 240 | vs | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | ATI | |
GPU name | Oland | M98 | |
Market | Desktop | Laptop | |
Clock speed | 730 MHz | 500 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | Yes | |
Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 320 | 1,600 | |
Texture mapping units | 20 | 80 | |
Render output processors | 8 | 32 | |
Compute units | 5 | 20 | |
Pixel rate | 6.24 GPixel/s | 16 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 15.6 GTexel/s | 40 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | 1,600 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon R7 240 | vs | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 700 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 1,800 MHz | 2,800 MHz | |
Memory bus | 128 bit | 512 bit | |
Memory | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 370 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | ||
730 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
710 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1030 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 250 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
630 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs R7 240 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||