0 Comments
| Radeon R7 240 vs HD 5770 Mac |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 108W | 3.6x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 4,780 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 76.48 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | Around 2.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 730 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,360 GFLOPS | vs | 499.2 GFLOPS | Around 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
More shading units | 800 | vs | 320 | 480 more shading units | |||
Higher texture rate | 34 GTexel/s | vs | 15.6 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
Slightly higher pixel rate | 13.6 GPixel/s | vs | 6.24 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,195 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | Around 35% higher memory clock speed | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 20 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
More compute units | 10 | vs | 5 | Twice as many compute units |
Features Key features of the Radeon R7 240 vs HD 5770 Mac
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Radeon R7 240
28.8 GB/s
Radeon HD 5770 Mac
76.48 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon R7 240
6.24 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 5770 Mac
13.6 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon R7 240
15.6 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 5770 Mac
34 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon R7 240
499.2 GFLOPS
Radeon HD 5770 Mac
1,360 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
Radeon R7 240
320
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R7 240 | vs | HD 5770 Mac |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | ATI | |
GPU name | Oland | Juniper | |
Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clock speed | 730 MHz | 850 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 320 | 800 | |
Texture mapping units | 20 | 40 | |
Render output processors | 8 | 16 | |
Compute units | 5 | 10 | |
Pixel rate | 6.24 GPixel/s | 13.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 15.6 GTexel/s | 34 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | 1,360 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon R7 240 | vs | HD 5770 Mac |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1,195 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 1,800 MHz | 4,780 MHz | |
Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit | |
Memory | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 76.48 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 30W | 108W |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 240 vs R7 370 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | ||
R7 240 vs 730 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
R7 240 vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 240 vs R7 250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 240 vs 6670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 240 vs 710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 240 vs 750 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||