Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 730 MHz vs 600 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Lower TDP 30W vs 65W 2.2x lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 6550D IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6550D IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the IGP Radeon HD 6550D IGP vs the AMD Radeon R7 240.

Features Key features of the Radeon R7 240  vs HD 6550D IGP 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R7 240
6.24 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 6550D IGP
4.8 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R7 240
15.6 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 6550D IGP
12 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R7 240
499.2 GFLOPS
Radeon HD 6550D IGP

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon R7 240  vs
HD 6550D IGP 
GPU name Oland BeaverCreek
Clock speed 730 MHz 600 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 30W 65W

raw performance

Radeon R7 240  vs
HD 6550D IGP 
Shading units 320 400
Texture mapping units 20 20
Render output processors 8 8
Compute units 5 5
Pixel rate 6.24 GPixel/s 4.8 GPixel/s
Texture rate 15.6 GTexel/s 12 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 499.2 GFLOPS 480 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus