Winner
AMD Radeon R7 240
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 240 based on its .
See full details | Radeon R7 240 vs HD 7660D IGP |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.1 | Overall Score |
| |
| |||||||
Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 100W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Slightly higher clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 730 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed |
gpu | Radeon R7 240 | vs | HD 7660D IGP |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | AMD | |
GPU name | Oland | Devastator | |
Clock speed | 730 MHz | 800 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | None | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 30W | 100W |
raw performance | Radeon R7 240 | vs | HD 7660D IGP |
---|---|---|---|
Shading units | 320 | 384 | |
Texture mapping units | 20 | 24 | |
Render output processors | 8 | 8 | |
Compute units | 5 | 6 | |
Pixel rate | 6.24 GPixel/s | 6.4 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 15.6 GTexel/s | 19.2 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | 614.4 GFLOPS |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 370 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | ||
730 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 250 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
630 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
6670 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
710 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750 vs R7 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 380 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||