Winner
AMD Radeon R7 240
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 240 based on its .
See full details Radeon R7 240 vs HD 7660D IGP |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 7660D IGP among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 100W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 730 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon R7 240 vs HD 7660D IGP
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
compute units Discrete cores within the GPU
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R7 240 | vs | HD 7660D IGP |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | AMD | |
| GPU name | Oland | Devastator | |
| Clock speed | 730 MHz | 800 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 30W | 100W | |
raw performance | Radeon R7 240 | vs | HD 7660D IGP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 320 | 384 | |
| Texture mapping units | 20 | 24 | |
| Render output processors | 8 | 8 | |
| Compute units | 5 | 6 | |
| Pixel rate | 6.24 GPixel/s | 6.4 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 15.6 GTexel/s | 19.2 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | 614.4 GFLOPS |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| R7 370 vs R7 240 | ||
 | VS | |
| $98 | ||
| 730 vs R7 240 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 550 vs R7 240 | ||
 | VS | |
| R7 250 vs R7 240 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| 630 vs R7 240 | ||
 | VS | |
| 710 vs R7 240 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1030 vs R7 240 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
