Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7750 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon R7 240 vs HD 7750 |
Released October, 2013
AMD Radeon R7 240
- 730 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
6.2 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The memory for the overclocked models would be configured at 1600 MHz which is 6.4 GHz effective, pumping out 307.2 FB/s compared to the reference 288 GB/s..
VS
Released February, 2012
AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 800 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.6 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Nov, 2012)The game's graphics are, even for today, top notch, yet the game will still run well on most computers.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 240 vs 7750 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Radeon HD 7750GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 55W | More than 45% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 4,500 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,704.51 | vs | 1,702.96 | Around 2.2x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better PassMark score | 1,682 | vs | 966 | Around 75% better PassMark score | |||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 730 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 160.35 | vs | 102.46 | More than 55% better sky diver factor score | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,125 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 512 | vs | 320 | 192 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 1,019 | vs | 621 | Around 65% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 240 vs HD 7750
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| R7 240 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 240 vs R7 370 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 240 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 240 vs 1030 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 240 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 7750 vs 650 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 7750 vs R7 250 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 Rev. A | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
