Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R7 250

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 625 MHz 60% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,600 MHz vs 1,600 MHz Around 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 1,408 vs 331 More than 4.2x better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 73.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s More than 2.8x higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 45% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
More shading units 384 vs 32 352 more shading units
Front view of GeForce 9700M GT

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 9700M GT

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 45W vs 65W More than 30% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce 9700M GT

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the Radeon R7 250  vs GeForce 9700M GT 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

Radeon R7 250
73.6 GB/s
GeForce 9700M GT
25.6 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R7 250
8.4 GPixel/s
GeForce 9700M GT
5 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R7 250
25.2 GTexel/s
GeForce 9700M GT
10 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R7 250
806.4 GFLOPS
GeForce 9700M GT
99.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Comments

comments powered by Disqus