GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 130M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.1

Overall Score

Winner
Radeon R7 250 

GPUBoss recommends the Radeon R7 250  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R7 250

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 600 MHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,600 MHz vs 1,600 MHz Around 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 1,408 vs 304 Around 4.8x better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 73.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s More than 2.8x higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 45% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
More shading units 384 vs 32 352 more shading units
Front view of GeForce GT 130M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 130M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 23W vs 65W 2.8x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GT 130M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250
3,347.68
GeForce GT 130M
2,744.48

Comments

comments powered by Disqus