GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 560 SE among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.7

Overall Score

Winner
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 560 SE 

GPUBoss recommends the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 560 SE  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R7 250

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 746 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,600 MHz vs 3,828 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 957 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 65W vs 150W 2.3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 560 SE

Reasons to consider the
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 560 SE

Report a correction
Better 3DMark06 score 20,300 vs 16,215 More than 25% better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 2,217 vs 1,408 More than 55% better PassMark score
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,300 vs 10,708 Around 25% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 91.9 GB/s vs 73.6 GB/s Around 25% higher memory bandwidth
More texture mapping units 48 vs 24 Twice as many texture mapping units
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Better cloud gate factor score 13.11 vs 11.94 Around 10% better cloud gate factor score
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250
117.34 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 560 SE
50.11 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250
23.56 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 560 SE
18.46 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250
264.86 frames/s
GeForce GTX 560 SE
618.77 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250
201.8 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 560 SE
136.97 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250
1.83 frames/s
GeForce GTX 560 SE
1.69 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus