Winner
Colorful GeForce GTX 650
GPUBoss recommends the Colorful GeForce GTX 650 based on its .
See full details| | Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 650 |
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The GPU core clock is maintained at 1000 MHz and the boost clock is configured at 1050 MHz.
by techPowerUp! (Sep, 2012)Temperatures are super low due to a high fan speed, but this offers no tangible benefits to the user - a quieter fan would be better.Price-wise, the KFA² GTX 650 EX OC comes at NVIDIA's reference design price, which is nice given the custom cooler and small overclock out of the box.
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| Radeon R7 250 N/A GeForce GTX 650 N/A | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Radeon R7 250 6.1 GeForce GTX 650 6.1 | |
| Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Radeon R7 250 5.6 GeForce GTX 650 5.6 | |
| Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| Radeon R7 250 6.4 GeForce GTX 650 6.4 | |
| TDP | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
| Radeon R7 250 5.9 GeForce GTX 650 5.9 | |
Winner |
| | | Colorful GeForce GTX 650GPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 16,215 | vs | 13,180 | Around 25% better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,058 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,000 MHz | vs | 4,600 MHz | Around 10% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,250 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | Around 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
GeForce GTX 650 | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)3DMark 11, as the name might suggest, makes use of the Microsoft DirectX 11 API and puts every feature of it to use, creating astonishingly realistic visuals.
Radeon R7 250 | by Josh-Walrath (Aug, 2013)3D Mark 2011 is a nice start to benchmarking as it gives pretty reliable results between runs.
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)Moving on, we have our 3DMark Vantage texture fillrate test, which does for texels and texture mapping units what the previous test does for ROPs.
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)We don't use 3DMark to draw GPU performance conclusions but it does make for a great optimization target.