GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R7 250

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 16,215 vs 5,378 More than 3x better 3DMark06 score
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 3,699 vs 1,408 Around 2.8x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 20,401 vs 10,708 More than 90% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s More than 3.2x higher texture rate
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 4,600 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,728 GFLOPS vs 806.4 GFLOPS Around 2.2x better floating-point performance
Better fire strike factor score 33.8 vs 15.71 Around 2.2x better fire strike factor score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,150 MHz More than 30% higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 8.4 GPixel/s Around 95% higher pixel rate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 46.7 fps vs 20.3 fps More than 2.2x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher bioshock infinite framerate 46.7 vs 20.3 More than 2.2x higher bioshock infinite framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 20.4 fps vs 10.6 fps More than 90% higher crysis 3 framerate
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
More texture mapping units 40 vs 24 16 more texture mapping units
Better T-Rex score 2.93 frames/s vs 1.83 frames/s More than 60% better T-Rex score
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,830 vs 912 More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250
117.34 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250
23.56 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Read more


Showing 1 comment.
it looks pretty silly when you rate these as 5.6 vs 6.2 for gaming but then show specific game benchmarks where the 750 TI has a MUCH larger lead than that. Maybe reevaluate your scoring system or use a better group of representative games?
comments powered by Disqus