Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti based on its compute performance and noise and power.
See full details Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 TiGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 16,215 | vs | 5,378 | More than 3x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 3,699 | vs | 1,408 | Around 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 20,401 | vs | 10,708 | More than 90% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 82.64 GTexel/s | vs | 25.2 GTexel/s | More than 3.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 4,600 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,728 GFLOPS | vs | 806.4 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 33.8 | vs | 15.71 | Around 2.2x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | More than 30% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 16.32 GPixel/s | vs | 8.4 GPixel/s | Around 95% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 46.7 fps | vs | 20.3 fps | More than 2.2x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 46.7 | vs | 20.3 | More than 2.2x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 20.4 fps | vs | 10.6 fps | More than 90% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 24 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 2.93 frames/s | vs | 1.83 frames/s | More than 60% better T-Rex score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,830 | vs | 912 | More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Radeon R7 250, starting from $3,067
- 9 desktops with the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, starting from $589
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $274 | |
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 760 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| R7 260X vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| R9 270 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 vs 750 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
