Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti based on its noise and power.
See full details Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
Released October, 2013
Generic Radeon R7 250
- 1 GHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.7 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The GPU core clock is maintained at 1000 MHz and the boost clock is configured at 1050 MHz.
VS
Released February, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.1 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Still, the GTX 750 Ti's reference price is too high at $150, which has other cards offer a better price/performance ratio.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Radeon R7 250 vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 4,600 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 33.8 | vs | 15.71 | Around 2.2x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,305.6 GFLOPS | vs | 806.4 GFLOPS | More than 60% better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | vs | 73.6 GB/s | More than 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 40.8 GTexel/s | vs | 25.2 GTexel/s | More than 60% higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 16.32 GPixel/s | vs | 8.4 GPixel/s | Around 95% higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,350 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 24 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 35 | vs | 14.9 | More than 2.2x higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
| Better bitcoin mining score | 173.22 mHash/s | vs | 117.34 mHash/s | Around 50% better bitcoin mining score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Radeon R7 250, starting from $3,067
- 8 desktops with the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, starting from $979
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1030 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 760 vs 750 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
