GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 7660D IGP among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Radeon R7 250 

GPUBoss recommends the Radeon R7 250  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R7 250

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 16,215 vs 1,433 More than 11.2x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 800 MHz 25% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 10,708 vs 5,126 More than 2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 20.3 fps vs 8.5 fps Around 2.5x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 10.6 fps vs 5.1 fps More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly higher metro: last light framerate 14.3 vs 6.8 More than 2x higher metro: last light framerate
Lower TDP 65W vs 100W 35% lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 7660D IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 7660D IGP

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,109 vs 2,775 More than 3.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs HD 7660D IGP

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Metro: Last Light

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA


comments powered by Disqus