Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7750 based on its .
See full details Radeon R7 250 vs HD 7750 |
Released October, 2013
Generic Radeon R7 250
- 1 GHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The GPU core clock is maintained at 1000 MHz and the boost clock is configured at 1050 MHz.
VS
Released February, 2012
AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 800 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.1 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Aug, 2012)AMD's Cape Verde graphics processor uses the GCN shader architecture, it is also the second GPU to be produced on a 28 nm process at TSMC.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 7750
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | AMD Radeon HD 7750GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 25% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark06 score | 16,215 | vs | 12,730 | More than 25% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly better passmark score | 1,635 | vs | 1,393 | More than 15% better passmark score | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 12.8 GPixel/s | vs | 8 GPixel/s | More than 60% higher pixel rate | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 512 | vs | 384 | 128 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly more compute units | 8 | vs | 6 | 2 more compute units | |||
| Slightly better passmark direct compute score | 948 | vs | 799 | Around 20% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 55W | vs | 65W | More than 15% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs HD 7750
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
Radeon R7 250 | by hassan-mujtaba (Jun, 2014)The chip was able to deliver a score of 16285 3D Marks in 3DMark 05 which heavily relies on the CPU performance.
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Josh-Walrath (Aug, 2013)3D Mark 2011 is a nice start to benchmarking as it gives pretty reliable results between runs.
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)We'll turn to 3DMark Vantage first to stress ROP and texel rates.
3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)We don't use 3DMark to draw GPU performance conclusions but it does make for a great optimization target.
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
