Radeon R7 250 vs HD 7750 |
Released October, 2013
Generic Radeon R7 250
- 1 GHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The GPU core clock is maintained at 1000 MHz and the boost clock is configured at 1050 MHz.
VS
Released February, 2012
AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 800 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
by techPowerUp! (Nov, 2012)The game's graphics are, even for today, top notch, yet the game will still run well on most computers.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,215 | vs | 3,200 | More than 5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 25% higher clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 12,640 | vs | 2,775 | More than 4.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 12.8 GPixel/s | vs | 8 GPixel/s | More than 60% higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs HD 7750
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Josh-Walrath (Aug, 2013)3D Mark 2011 is a nice start to benchmarking as it gives pretty reliable results between runs.
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)We'll turn to 3DMark Vantage first to stress ROP and texel rates.
3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)We don't use 3DMark to draw GPU performance conclusions but it does make for a great optimization target.
