GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 7750


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load


GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

AMD Radeon HD 7750 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7750  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Front view of Radeon HD 7750

AMD Radeon HD 7750

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R7 250

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 800 MHz 25% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark06 score 16,215 vs 12,730 More than 25% better 3DMark06 score
Front view of Radeon HD 7750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7750

Report a correction
Slightly higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 8 GPixel/s More than 60% higher pixel rate
Slightly more shading units 512 vs 384 128 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 32 vs 24 8 more texture mapping units
Slightly more compute units 8 vs 6 2 more compute units
Slightly better passmark direct compute score 947 vs 805 Around 20% better passmark direct compute score
Slightly lower TDP 55W vs 65W More than 15% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs HD 7750

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

Starting with this review we are moving to the latest iteration of our GPU benchmark suite, which drops Battlefield 3 for a now far more stable Battlefield 4.
Radeon R7 250 | by Ryan-Smith (Feb, 2014)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3D Mark 2011 is a nice start to benchmarking as it gives pretty reliable results between runs.
Radeon R7 250 | by Josh-Walrath (Aug, 2013)

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

We'll turn to 3DMark Vantage first to stress ROP and texel rates.
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

The chip was able to deliver a score of 16285 3D Marks in 3DMark 05 which heavily relies on the CPU performance.
Radeon R7 250 | by hassan-mujtaba (Jun, 2014)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute


Showing 3 comments.
7750 has mantle too
lol. This seems wrong. I think GPUBoss mixed the 3Dmark benchmarks. If you compare the 7750 with R7 260x (better than R7 250) on futuremark, it's 3240 vs 5280. No way the 250 card can double that!
so 7750 is better than r7 250 but r7 250 have directx11.2 and openGL 4.3 and mantle. but 7750 is better
comments powered by Disqus