Winner
Radeon R7 250
GPUBoss recommends the Radeon R7 250 based on its .
See full details Radeon R7 250 vs HD 7750 |
Released October, 2013
Generic Radeon R7 250
- 1 GHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.1 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The GPU core clock is maintained at 1000 MHz and the boost clock is configured at 1050 MHz.
VS
Released February, 2012
AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 800 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.1 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Nov, 2012)The game's graphics are, even for today, top notch, yet the game will still run well on most computers.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs 7750
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Generic Radeon R7 250GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,215 | vs | 3,240 | More than 5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 25% higher clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 12,730 | vs | 2,775 | More than 4.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 12.8 GPixel/s | vs | 8 GPixel/s | More than 60% higher pixel rate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs HD 7750
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)We don't use 3DMark to draw GPU performance conclusions but it does make for a great optimization target.
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Josh-Walrath (Aug, 2013)3D Mark 2011 is a nice start to benchmarking as it gives pretty reliable results between runs.
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)We'll turn to 3DMark Vantage first to stress ROP and texel rates.
3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance
Radeon R7 250 | by Ryan-Smith (Sep, 2013)It’s not clear whether this is the same GPU as in 290X or not, and in lieu of specs AMD has given us a single benchmark: 3DMark Firemark, where it scores better than 6800.
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
