GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250 vs R7 240

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
Radeon R7 250 

GPUBoss recommends the Radeon R7 250  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R7 250

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 730 MHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 780 MHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 73.6 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s More than 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 30% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of Radeon R7 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 240

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 30W vs 65W 2.2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250 vs 240

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

We don't use 3DMark to draw GPU performance conclusions but it does make for a great optimization target.
Radeon R7 250 | by Anand-Lal-Shimpi (Jun, 2013)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus