GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250X vs 750 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 250X

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 30% higher memory bandwidth
Better T-Rex score 3.12 frames/s vs 2.34 frames/s Around 35% better T-Rex score
Front view of GeForce GTX 750

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 4,500 MHz More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed
Slightly higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 8.4 GPixel/s Around 95% higher pixel rate
Better fire strike factor score 28.99 vs 19.17 More than 50% better fire strike factor score
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,150 MHz Around 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250X vs GeForce GTX 750

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
151.74 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750
69.81 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
32.53 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750
34.24 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
620.39 frames/s
GeForce GTX 750
754.34 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
3,357.1
GeForce GTX 750
3,347.09

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
3,712.26
GeForce GTX 750
3,708.39

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

Showing 7 comments.
ChadeuX - It's not "technically" that AMD has a bunch of old graphics cards laying around and they say, "Let's just put R7 250X on these and resell them to the morons." Negative.. While they may have the same chipset, R&D puts some effort in here to tune the chipset and eek out as much performance as they can get out of them. This gives us power hungry people more FPS between chipset generations. It's smart business. If you have a 7770, you are not the target market for these cards as the performance gains would be minimal. The target market would be those still in the 6000 series or lower. FYI, ALL the manufacturers "rebadge" equipment. It's standard practice.
wow. amd sure is good at rebadging
anyway, this cards are almost the same to the hd7770, wich I own right now
umm... this is a 250x, not a 250....
The settings are of R7 250 This de review is fake, GPUBOSS=BULLSHIT
all right
i like my dicks big
comments powered by Disqus