GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250X vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Radeon R7 250X
n.d.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5.9
GeForce GTX 960
6.7
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon R7 250X
5.7
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.0
GeForce GTX 960
8.0
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Radeon R7 250X
6.2
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.6
GeForce GTX 960
6.4
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon R7 250X
7.6
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
7.9
GeForce GTX 960
8.2
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Radeon R7 250X
n.d.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
n.d.
GeForce GTX 960
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon R7 250X
9.6
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
9.6
GeForce GTX 960
9.1
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
6.2

Overall Score

Radeon R7 250X
6.0
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.2
GeForce GTX 960
7.1

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R7 250X

Front view of Radeon R7 250X
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 250X

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 20% higher memory bandwidth
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 4,500 MHz 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s More than 3.2x higher texture rate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,728 GFLOPS vs 806.4 GFLOPS Around 2.2x better floating-point performance
Better fire strike factor score 33.8 vs 19.17 More than 75% better fire strike factor score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,150 MHz More than 30% higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 8.4 GPixel/s Around 95% higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 40 vs 24 16 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
151.96 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
32.22 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
638.53 frames/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
849.54 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
3,357.1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
3,353.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
3,712.26
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
3,702.15

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 250X
19.17
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
33.8

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 250X
180.27
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
255.03

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 250X
13.43
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
17.81

Read more

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
Linked Designs (06:38 PM, November 18, 2016)
"GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti based on its noise and power. " That's honestly the last thing I care about. I think most people care more about the performance and how loud a GPU gets is an afterthought. Power consumption is somewhat if you're going for a power bill friendly build, but it's not like the 250X is far behind at all. There is also too many missing information to declare a winner here. There's no gaming score for the R7 250X and there's no computing score for the GTX 750 Ti.
Tracy Ripple (03:24 AM, September 9, 2015)
Something wrong with the numbers here. They both have a 128 bit memory bus and GDDR5 memory, but the GTX has a faster clock.... so how the hell does the R7 have higher memory bandwidth? 128 bits at 1500 meg is faster than 128 bits at 1150 - no getting around that.
Kanishka-Kun (01:58 AM, July 23, 2015)
Okay so the R7 250X is rumored then how the hell do i have it in my pc??????
Siliconpower74 (01:18 AM, April 5, 2015)
FAKE
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss