GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 250X vs R7 250 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.6

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R7 250X 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 250X  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 250X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 250X

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 73.6 GB/s More than 40% higher memory bandwidth
Better T-Rex score 2.96 frames/s vs 1.83 frames/s More than 60% better T-Rex score
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
Front view of Radeon R7 250

Reasons to consider the
Generic Radeon R7 250

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Radeon R7 250 vs the AMD Radeon R7 250X.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 250X vs 250

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
151.96 mHash/s
Radeon R7 250
117.34 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
32.22 mPixels/s
Radeon R7 250
23.56 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
638.53 frames/s
Radeon R7 250
264.86 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
3,357.1
Radeon R7 250
3,347.68

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 250X
3,712.26
Radeon R7 250
3,703.63

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus