GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260 vs 610 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
ASUS GeForce GT 610 

GPUBoss recommends the ASUS GeForce GT 610  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 1,200 MHz 5x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 96 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s More than 10x higher memory bandwidth
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 810 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,536 GFLOPS vs 155.52 GFLOPS Around 10x better floating-point performance
Much higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 600 MHz 2.5x higher memory clock speed
Significantly better fire strike factor score 33.04 vs 3.22 More than 10.2x better fire strike factor score
Higher texture rate 48 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s Around 7.5x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 16 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s Around 10x higher pixel rate
More shading units 768 vs 48 720 more shading units
More texture mapping units 48 vs 8 40 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Better face detection score 26.19 mPixels/s vs 2.47 mPixels/s More than 10.5x better face detection score
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
Lower TDP 29W vs 95W 3.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GT 610

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
240.4 mHash/s
GeForce GT 610
4.05 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
26.19 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 610
2.47 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
798.24 frames/s
GeForce GT 610
79.36 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
315.58 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 610
22.74 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
4.22 frames/s
GeForce GT 610
0.23 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus