GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260 vs 750 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 96 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 20% higher memory bandwidth
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,536 GFLOPS vs 1,044.5 GFLOPS More than 45% better floating-point performance
Slightly higher texture rate 48 GTexel/s vs 32.6 GTexel/s More than 45% higher texture rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 768 vs 512 256 more shading units
More texture mapping units 48 vs 32 16 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 750

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Report a correction
Better face detection score 42.74 mPixels/s vs 26.19 mPixels/s Around 65% better face detection score
Lower TDP 55W vs 95W More than 40% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 750

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
240.4 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750
69.81 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
26.19 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750
42.74 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
798.24 frames/s
GeForce GTX 750
754.52 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
315.58 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 750
382.92 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260
4.22 frames/s
GeForce GTX 750
3.23 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus