Winner
Colorful GeForce GTX 650
GPUBoss recommends the Colorful GeForce GTX 650 based on its benchmarks and noise and power.
See full details Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 650 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 5.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Colorful GeForce GTX 650GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 11,820 | vs | 2,870 | More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,500 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | 30% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 3,128 | vs | 1,831 | More than 70% better PassMark score | |||
| Much higher battlefield 3 framerate | 40.1 fps | vs | 34 fps | Around 20% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,971.2 GFLOPS | vs | 812.5 GFLOPS | Around 2.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | vs | 80 GB/s | 30% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher texture rate | 61.6 GTexel/s | vs | 33.9 GTexel/s | More than 80% higher texture rate | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 3.67 frames/s | vs | 1.01 frames/s | Around 3.8x better T-Rex score | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 33.7 | vs | 17.21 | More than 95% better fire strike factor score | |||
| More shading units | 896 | vs | 384 | 512 more shading units | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 17.6 GPixel/s | vs | 8.46 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | 30% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 32 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,681 | vs | 813 | More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 13,180 | vs | 1,903 | Around 7x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 11,600 | vs | 6,931 | More than 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 32.5 | vs | 13.5 | Around 2.5x higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Lower TDP | 65W | vs | 115W | Around 45% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Bioshock Infinite
FarCry 3
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
