GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 650 Ti among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.2

Overall Score

Winner
Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 5,400 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,006 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 20% higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,350 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 33.7 vs 24.78 More than 35% better fire strike factor score
Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Axigon GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 44 vs 6.8 Around 6.5x higher crysis 3 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
Actually there are no benchmark tests on this comparison. It is just the specifications of each card. So their is nothing here to manipulate. And they have the specs right. If you go to the manufactures website or techpowerup's site, you will see the specs here are correct. They can't manipulate card specifications unless they are able to open the card up and physically saw GPU chips. But when they do show benchmarks on this site? They do use benchmark software that has manipulated code. Because benchmark software companies now get payoffs for marketing.
Actually there are no benchmark tests on this comparison. It is just the specifications of each card. So their is nothing here to manipulate. And they have the specs right. If you go to the manufactures website or techpowerup's site, you will see the specs here are correct. They can't manipulate card specifications unless they are able to open the card up and physically saw GPU chips. But when they do show benchmarks on this site? They do use benchmark software that has manipulated code. Because benchmark software companies now get payoffs for marketing.
The good old 650 Ti. Still a good video card. If my 650 Ti had 2GB instead of 1GB I would still be using it, I finally got a 2GB card a R9 270. And I miss the Nvidia drivers really bad. As a matter of fact I am thinking about actually re-installing my 650 Ti until AMD finally fires the crap driver coders and gets the drivers right.
please stop manipulating tests
comments powered by Disqus