Winner
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost based on its gaming and benchmarks.
See full details Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
Released October, 2013
AMD Radeon R7 260X
- 1.1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.5 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Alongside the Radeon R9 280X and R9 270X, AMD launched its entry-level Radeon R7 260X graphics card, fit for visually-intensive desktops with some mild gaming thrown into the mix.
VS
Released March, 2013
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.3 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)ZOTAC's custom cooler is a nice improvement over NVIDIA's reference design cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 650 Ti Boost among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 11,820 | vs | 5,770 | More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,006 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | vs | 1,527 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 115W | vs | 134W | Around 15% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 17,060 | vs | 1,903 | Around 9x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 21,830 | vs | 6,931 | Around 3.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,713.86 | vs | 1,779.88 | More than 2x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 146.6 GB/s | vs | 104 GB/s | More than 40% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 73.6 fps | vs | 40.1 fps | Around 85% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Crysis 3
FarCry 3
Reviews Word on the street
| Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ||
 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $341 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 480 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1060 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 460 vs 950 | ||
| | VS | |
| RX 460 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 950M vs 960M | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
