Winner
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost based on its benchmarks.
See full details Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
Released October, 2013
AMD Radeon R7 260X
- 1.1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Alongside the Radeon R9 280X and R9 270X, AMD launched its entry-level Radeon R7 260X graphics card, fit for visually-intensive desktops with some mild gaming thrown into the mix.
VS
Released March, 2013
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.6 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)ZOTAC's custom cooler is a nice improvement over NVIDIA's reference design cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 650 Ti Boost among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 11,820 | vs | 5,770 | More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,006 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,500 MHz | vs | 6,108 MHz | More than 5% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better video composition score | 63.75 frames/s | vs | 34.54 frames/s | Around 85% better video composition score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | vs | 1,527 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 115W | vs | 134W | Around 15% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 17,060 | vs | 1,903 | Around 9x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 21,830 | vs | 6,931 | Around 3.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much higher battlefield 3 framerate | 73.6 fps | vs | 40.1 fps | Around 85% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 146.6 GB/s | vs | 104 GB/s | More than 40% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 47 | vs | 6.8 | Around 7x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 39.39 | vs | 33.7 | More than 15% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Crysis 3
FarCry 3
Reviews Word on the street
| Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ||
 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $282 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $282 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $282 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1070 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RX Vega 64 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
