GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 650 Ti Boost among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Radeon R7 260X
5.2
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
6.7
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.0
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon R7 260X
6.2
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
6.3
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
7.2
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Radeon R7 260X
6.4
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
5.8
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.1
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon R7 260X
7.4
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
7.6
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
8.6
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Radeon R7 260X
9.6
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
n.d.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5.2
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon R7 260X
9.1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
8.0
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
9.6
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
7

Overall Score

Radeon R7 260X
7.0
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
6.7
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.8

Winner
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 

GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R7 260X

Front view of Radeon R7 260X
Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

GPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,820 vs 5,770 More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,006 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Slightly higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,527 MHz More than 5% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 115W vs 134W Around 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 17,060 vs 1,903 Around 9x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 21,830 vs 6,931 Around 3.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate 73.6 fps vs 40.1 fps Around 85% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher memory bandwidth 146.6 GB/s vs 104 GB/s More than 40% higher memory bandwidth
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
225.3 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
48.92 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
43.62 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
20.84 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
3,355.86
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
3,232.04

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
3,710.09
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
3,713.86

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 260X
33.7
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
39.39

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 260X
264.35
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
251.51

Crysis 3

Radeon R7 260X
6.8
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
47

FarCry 3

Radeon R7 260X
37
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
35

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R7 260X  vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 
7.8
read review
9.6
read review
Gaming noise is much improved too, which should result in a really quiet gaming experience.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
Alec van Zyl (02:55 AM, July 8, 2014)
It should support it. Whether or not the A8 or any of the APU's have better performance with their amd Graphics brethren than with Nvidia's cards I do not know It would be interesting to see which performs better with a AMD apu like the A8.
Michael Mamauag (06:24 PM, March 25, 2014)
pls help.... about AMD RICHLAND A8-6600K 3.9GHz support Asus Gtx650 TI boost 2GB?
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss