Winner
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost based on its .
See full details Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
Released October, 2013
AMD Radeon R7 260X
- 1.1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.5 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Alongside the Radeon R9 280X and R9 270X, AMD launched its entry-level Radeon R7 260X graphics card, fit for visually-intensive desktops with some mild gaming thrown into the mix.
VS
Released March, 2013
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)ZOTAC's custom cooler is a nice improvement over NVIDIA's reference design cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 650 Ti Boost
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| battlefield 3 (2013) | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,006 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,971 GFLOPS | vs | 1,545 GFLOPS | Around 30% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | vs | 1,527 MHz | More than 5% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 21,830 | vs | 17,590 | Around 25% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | vs | 104 GB/s | Around 40% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 73.6 fps | vs | 40.1 fps | Around 85% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)3DMark 11, as the name might suggest, makes use of the Microsoft DirectX 11 API and puts every feature of it to use, creating astonishingly realistic visuals.
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance
Battlefield 3 (2013) 1920x1080 - Ultra quality + FXAA-HIGH
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2013)Gaming noise is much improved too, delivering a very quiet gaming experience.
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Reviews Word on the street
| Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ||
 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| R9 270X vs 760 | ||
 | VS |  |
| R9 280X vs 770 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 750 Ti vs 660 | ||
| | VS | |
| 760 vs 770 | ||
| | VS | |
| 760 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 780 Ti vs 780 | ||
| | VS | |
| 760 vs 660 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
