GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 750 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Radeon R7 260X
5.0
GeForce GTX 750
5.8
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon R7 260X
6.0
GeForce GTX 750
5.8
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.0
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Radeon R7 260X
6.5
GeForce GTX 750
6.1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.6
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon R7 260X
7.2
GeForce GTX 750
7.8
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
8.1
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Radeon R7 260X
n.d.
GeForce GTX 750
n.d.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon R7 260X
9.1
GeForce GTX 750
9.7
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
9.6
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
6.5

Overall Score

Radeon R7 260X
6.3
GeForce GTX 750
6.5
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.8

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750  based on its benchmarks and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R7 260X

Front view of Radeon R7 260X
Front view of GeForce GTX 750

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

GPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 30% higher effective memory clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,715.1 vs 1,745.62 Around 2.2x better manhattan score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,971.2 GFLOPS vs 1,044.5 GFLOPS Around 90% better floating-point performance
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,020 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 30% higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 61.6 GTexel/s vs 32.6 GTexel/s Around 90% higher texture rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 30% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 896 vs 512 384 more shading units
More texture mapping units 56 vs 32 24 more texture mapping units
Better video composition score 63.64 frames/s vs 43.55 frames/s More than 45% better video composition score
Slightly better fire strike factor score 33.7 vs 28.99 More than 15% better fire strike factor score
Front view of GeForce GTX 750

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Report a correction
Higher thief framerate 24 vs 7.7 More than 3x higher thief framerate
Lower TDP 55W vs 115W 2.1x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
222.35 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750
142.02 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
43.73 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750
34.24 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
3,357.58
GeForce GTX 750
3,351.5

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
3,715.1
GeForce GTX 750
1,745.62

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 260X
33.7
GeForce GTX 750
28.99

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 260X
264.35
GeForce GTX 750
233.04

Thief

Radeon R7 260X
7.7
GeForce GTX 750
24

Battlefield 4

Radeon R7 260X
8.2
GeForce GTX 750
35

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R7 260X  vs GeForce GTX 750 
7.8
read review
9.0
read review
The game is a crossover of several of Ubisoft's best works, including Assassin's Creed and Far Cry 3, and still manages to feel unique.
GeForce GTX 750

Comments

Showing 14 comments.
Amir (12:54 PM, October 25, 2018)
it has been for 4 years, own 1x Zotac GTX 750 Ti 2GB and 2x asus/MSI GTX 750 1GB and 1x Asus Radeon R7 260X 2GB. R7 260X have better specs but when i run gaming and later try use benchmark R7 260X still lost lol.... dunno why... also R7 260X still hotter than gtx 750
اسامة ابورميلة (03:47 PM, August 11, 2015)
hahaha.....lool....and i thing that....:P
Ivo Iodko (04:57 PM, June 24, 2015)
how much did nvidia pay you? xD 260x is faster, make sure
Chili (02:58 AM, May 10, 2015)
y si, al parecer deben manipular todo a favor de nvidia.
Siliconpower74 (01:23 AM, April 5, 2015)
hostia puta que risa, que una R7 260X tira lo mismo que una GTX 750 MIS COJONES. Hasta mi R7 250X es mas potente que esa patata de nvidia FAKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
a_one (06:56 AM, January 2, 2015)
you probably pickup early edition asus or gigabyte with extra 6-pin power connector.. in my case i use MSI gaming GTX750 OC (dont have extra 6-pin slot) + Pentium G3220 + Msi B85i = 160watt only :D Plus in my state, GTX750 and r7 260x sale at the same price....
PeterTechGuy (09:03 AM, December 27, 2014)
I think that's a sarcasm.
Shaurya Singh (05:34 AM, November 5, 2014)
Guys don't buy 750 this is a shit card R260x is better than 750 I have both card 750 is shit.
imascout1 (12:14 PM, August 20, 2014)
I think he was trying to say fucking 750 :D
Kristian (07:31 AM, August 20, 2014)
what brand is fakcen? never heard of it, the stock geforce gtx 750 does infact have does scores.(or around it)
william (12:47 AM, June 27, 2014)
please stop manipulating test
Omar Adel Abd Elglil (11:02 PM, June 18, 2014)
fakeeeeeeeeeeeee~!!! i baught the fakcen 750 and didnot give me HALF of that
poweruser (08:23 PM, June 5, 2014)
If you compare two cards made in the same technology that makes a difference, here you have two different chips, maxwell is very efficient architecture cause as you can see even with those lower specs it still beats the 260x in games, upcoming cards from nvidia based on this architecture will be a monsters, 2x lower TDP and still better performance :D
Muhammad (07:57 PM, May 17, 2014)
Has better specs in everything except for power usage. Still loses. Seems legit...
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss