Radeon R7 260X  vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

I did my comparison 3 years ago and back then, based on all the TH real game benchmarks, the 750Ti was clearly the winner. Here's an article comparing the two cards in 2014: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-review Here's a video review in 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hc0xUReZwU

I will stop accessing this site, it is manipulating the results

Gpu boss Nvidia+İntel Fans :D hahahaha

actually the R7 360 its competing with GTX750Ti, the R7 360 is an 768-Core R7 260X, a Renamed R7 260 and then the R7 260X would crush the GTX750Ti lol

lol actually the R7 360 is an r7 260 with just 768-Radeon Cores and gets FPS like the GTX750Ti, but then the R7 260X have 896-Radeon Cores lol

How have you read anywhere that it beats it?

In my years of buying hardware for my system, I've always used tomshardware as a guide. I've almost always decided to buy AMD/Radeon until this go around. They might have a slight bias, but you can see all the time (by looking at the data) that AMD cards used to beat intel cards of the same price. However, I've come to the realization that AMD has lost ALL innovation. Instead of creating something new, they use the R-series cards to just rehash an older card with slight upgrades. Intel/Nvidia has clearly taken them over again (Intel had to bail out AMD before) in the availability of price and quality of product.

The thing is that AMD was fine up until the R series. Everything since the old HD7770 etc, is a rehash of older products. All they did was update the built-in GPU on the chip and add a slight speed increase. The only thing I really like about AMD is with the Graphics card and the APU can use crossfire.

Dude, those are "Theoretical Benchmarks" based of the "Specs". Anyone that has ever bought anything related to a PC know that the specs alone don't mean a card will be good. Which is the situation here. The benchmarking given on this site and many others show that the REAL, machine-tested benchmarking shows the 750 ti outperforms.

AMD = Muscle Car Nvidia = Sport Car

AMD=Camaro (who cares how it performs, they're hot) Nvidia =WRX (every owner thinks they are a rally driver) They both have their advantages, I know which one I would like in my garage.

Yes, easily. Most of the power draw is through the PCI-e slot, any supplementary power is via the 6 pin connector. If your PSU does not have a six pin connector, a molex adapter will do.

The 750 Ti saves energy AND beats it.

And they didn't even mention the 256 more Stream Processors of the R7 260X

sometimes its a silicon lottery and now more games are not so biased towards nvidia

amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck

What is your evidence?

Toms Hardware is extremely biased towards nvidia/intel.

Provide a link to the power supply you own, I could not understand what you have from your post.

You're on crack. http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2014-vga-charts/compare,3598.html?prod%5B6943%5D=on&prod%5B6789%5D=on

hi i want to buy gainward gtx 750 ti golden sample but i have ower next 1000w.t.c and realy outder is 330w can i run this card with this power?

hi i want to buy gainward gtx 750 ti golden sample but i have ower next 1000w.t.c and realy outder is 330w can i run this card with this power?

its official the 260x destroys the 750 ti getting on average 20 fps more

People purposely wanting to use hardware specs or use one synthetic benchmark over another, and totally ignore in-game results, are either doing it out of ignorance or to make them feel better about purchasing the wrong card. If you want to make purchasing decisions based on meaningful data instead of out of ignorance, look for in-game FPS scores at the resolution you intend to play at. There are many in-game scores on Toms Hardware for both of these cards. http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2014-vga-charts/compare,3598.html?prod%5B6943%5D=on&prod%5B6789%5D=on

Stay away from the R7 260X. So many memory clock and black screen problems