GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs for under $200

Gaming

Radeon R7 260X
5.0
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.5
GeForce GTX 950
7.2
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon R7 260X
6.5
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
8.8
GeForce GTX 950
6.6
T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Radeon R7 260X
7.3
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.7
GeForce GTX 950
7.4
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon R7 260X
5.1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
8.7
GeForce GTX 950
7.1
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Radeon R7 260X
9.4
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5.1
GeForce GTX 950
5.1
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

Radeon R7 260X
7.2
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
8.8
GeForce GTX 950
7.9
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
7.6

Overall Score

Radeon R7 260X
6.6
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
7.6
GeForce GTX 950
6.9

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R7 260X

Front view of Radeon R7 260X
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 5,400 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Slightly higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,020 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,971.2 GFLOPS vs 1,305.6 GFLOPS More than 50% better floating-point performance
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 20% higher memory bandwidth
Slightly higher texture rate 61.6 GTexel/s vs 40.8 GTexel/s More than 50% higher texture rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,350 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed
Slightly more shading units 896 vs 640 256 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 56 vs 40 16 more texture mapping units
Slightly better bitcoin mining score 225.27 mHash/s vs 173.22 mHash/s More than 30% better bitcoin mining score
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 35 vs 8.2 More than 4.2x higher battlefield 4 framerate
Lower TDP 60W vs 115W Around 50% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
225.27 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
173.22 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
43.62 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
44.94 mPixels/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 260X
33.7
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
33.8

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 260X
264.35
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
255.03

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Radeon R7 260X
16.87
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
17.81

Battlefield 4

Radeon R7 260X
8.2
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
35

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R7 260X  vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti 
7.8
read review
9.0
read review
GPU Temperature ComparisonIdleLoadPalit GTX 750 Ti StormX Dual28°C69°CNVIDIA GTX 750 Ti30°C66°CASUS GTX 750 Ti OC28°C62°CMSI GTX 750 Ti Gaming27°C56°C Important: GPU temperature will vary depending on clock speed, voltage settings, cooler design, and production variances.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Read more

Comments

Showing 25 comments.
DannyDan (06:22 PM, June 6, 2017)
I did my comparison 3 years ago and back then, based on all the TH real game benchmarks, the 750Ti was clearly the winner. Here's an article comparing the two cards in 2014: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-review Here's a video review in 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hc0xUReZwU
Eduardo Betta (12:47 PM, June 6, 2017)
r7 260x has about 20% more performance than 750 ti
Eduardo Betta (09:56 PM, May 25, 2017)
only for you
Eduardo Betta (09:55 PM, May 25, 2017)
it´s equal some games she outperforms 750 ti and some she loses
Eduardo Betta (09:53 PM, May 25, 2017)
260x outperforms 750 ti in some games
Lucas Nicoloso (11:18 PM, February 5, 2017)
I will stop accessing this site, it is manipulating the results
Fatih Wylde (08:45 PM, September 28, 2016)
Gpu boss Nvidia+İntel Fans :D hahahaha
Amet Monegro (01:52 PM, December 28, 2015)
actually the R7 360 its competing with GTX750Ti, the R7 360 is an 768-Core R7 260X, a Renamed R7 260 and then the R7 260X would crush the GTX750Ti lol
Amet Monegro (01:50 PM, December 28, 2015)
lol actually the R7 360 is an r7 260 with just 768-Radeon Cores and gets FPS like the GTX750Ti, but then the R7 260X have 896-Radeon Cores lol
Robert Siegrist (05:20 AM, June 24, 2015)
How have you read anywhere that it beats it?
Robert Siegrist (05:19 AM, June 24, 2015)
In my years of buying hardware for my system, I've always used tomshardware as a guide. I've almost always decided to buy AMD/Radeon until this go around. They might have a slight bias, but you can see all the time (by looking at the data) that AMD cards used to beat intel cards of the same price. However, I've come to the realization that AMD has lost ALL innovation. Instead of creating something new, they use the R-series cards to just rehash an older card with slight upgrades. Intel/Nvidia has clearly taken them over again (Intel had to bail out AMD before) in the availability of price and quality of product.
Robert Siegrist (05:14 AM, June 24, 2015)
The thing is that AMD was fine up until the R series. Everything since the old HD7770 etc, is a rehash of older products. All they did was update the built-in GPU on the chip and add a slight speed increase. The only thing I really like about AMD is with the Graphics card and the APU can use crossfire.
Robert Siegrist (05:12 AM, June 24, 2015)
Dude, those are "Theoretical Benchmarks" based of the "Specs". Anyone that has ever bought anything related to a PC know that the specs alone don't mean a card will be good. Which is the situation here. The benchmarking given on this site and many others show that the REAL, machine-tested benchmarking shows the 750 ti outperforms.
REDLINE_ThatDAMNGuy (07:08 AM, June 13, 2015)
AMD = Muscle Car Nvidia = Sport Car
panther063 (02:19 AM, May 12, 2015)
AMD=Camaro (who cares how it performs, they're hot) Nvidia =WRX (every owner thinks they are a rally driver) They both have their advantages, I know which one I would like in my garage.
panther063 (02:11 AM, May 12, 2015)
Yes, easily. Most of the power draw is through the PCI-e slot, any supplementary power is via the 6 pin connector. If your PSU does not have a six pin connector, a molex adapter will do.
Chubzdoomer (06:08 PM, April 20, 2015)
The 750 Ti saves energy AND beats it.
Marios Sklavenitis (08:38 PM, April 18, 2015)
And they didn't even mention the 256 more Stream Processors of the R7 260X
Cameron (08:07 PM, April 10, 2015)
sometimes its a silicon lottery and now more games are not so biased towards nvidia
guest (08:09 PM, April 4, 2015)
amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck
DannyDan (09:35 PM, March 30, 2015)
What is your evidence?
MannyMan (06:32 PM, March 30, 2015)
Toms Hardware is extremely biased towards nvidia/intel.
DannyDan (04:29 PM, February 6, 2015)
Provide a link to the power supply you own, I could not understand what you have from your post.
DannyDan (04:21 PM, February 6, 2015)
You're on crack. http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2014-vga-charts/compare,3598.html?prod%5B6943%5D=on&prod%5B6789%5D=on
hossein_pearce (07:03 PM, February 1, 2015)
hi i want to buy gainward gtx 750 ti golden sample but i have ower next 1000w.t.c and realy outder is 330w can i run this card with this power?
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss