GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 5,400 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,020 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 20% higher memory bandwidth
More shading units 896 vs 640 256 more shading units
More texture mapping units 56 vs 40 16 more texture mapping units
Slightly better T-Rex score 3.67 frames/s vs 2.93 frames/s More than 25% better T-Rex score
Higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,502 MHz Around 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 20,401 vs 6,931 Around 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 5,378 vs 1,903 More than 2.8x better 3DMark06 score
Slightly better PassMark score 3,699 vs 3,128 Around 20% better PassMark score
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel/s Around 35% higher texture rate
Higher thief framerate 27.6 vs 7.7 More than 3.5x higher thief framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 20.4 fps vs 15.4 fps More than 30% higher crysis 3 framerate
Lower TDP 60W vs 115W Around 50% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
222.35 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
43.73 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Read more

Comments

Showing 25 comments.
I did my comparison 3 years ago and back then, based on all the TH real game benchmarks, the 750Ti was clearly the winner. Here's an article comparing the two cards in 2014: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-review Here's a video review in 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hc0xUReZwU
I will stop accessing this site, it is manipulating the results
Gpu boss Nvidia+İntel Fans :D hahahaha
actually the R7 360 its competing with GTX750Ti, the R7 360 is an 768-Core R7 260X, a Renamed R7 260 and then the R7 260X would crush the GTX750Ti lol
lol actually the R7 360 is an r7 260 with just 768-Radeon Cores and gets FPS like the GTX750Ti, but then the R7 260X have 896-Radeon Cores lol
How have you read anywhere that it beats it?
In my years of buying hardware for my system, I've always used tomshardware as a guide. I've almost always decided to buy AMD/Radeon until this go around. They might have a slight bias, but you can see all the time (by looking at the data) that AMD cards used to beat intel cards of the same price. However, I've come to the realization that AMD has lost ALL innovation. Instead of creating something new, they use the R-series cards to just rehash an older card with slight upgrades. Intel/Nvidia has clearly taken them over again (Intel had to bail out AMD before) in the availability of price and quality of product.
The thing is that AMD was fine up until the R series. Everything since the old HD7770 etc, is a rehash of older products. All they did was update the built-in GPU on the chip and add a slight speed increase. The only thing I really like about AMD is with the Graphics card and the APU can use crossfire.
Dude, those are "Theoretical Benchmarks" based of the "Specs". Anyone that has ever bought anything related to a PC know that the specs alone don't mean a card will be good. Which is the situation here. The benchmarking given on this site and many others show that the REAL, machine-tested benchmarking shows the 750 ti outperforms.
AMD = Muscle Car Nvidia = Sport Car
AMD=Camaro (who cares how it performs, they're hot) Nvidia =WRX (every owner thinks they are a rally driver) They both have their advantages, I know which one I would like in my garage.
Yes, easily. Most of the power draw is through the PCI-e slot, any supplementary power is via the 6 pin connector. If your PSU does not have a six pin connector, a molex adapter will do.
The 750 Ti saves energy AND beats it.
And they didn't even mention the 256 more Stream Processors of the R7 260X
sometimes its a silicon lottery and now more games are not so biased towards nvidia
amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck amd driver suck
What is your evidence?
Toms Hardware is extremely biased towards nvidia/intel.
Provide a link to the power supply you own, I could not understand what you have from your post.
You're on crack. http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2014-vga-charts/compare,3598.html?prod%5B6943%5D=on&prod%5B6789%5D=on
hi i want to buy gainward gtx 750 ti golden sample but i have ower next 1000w.t.c and realy outder is 330w can i run this card with this power?
hi i want to buy gainward gtx 750 ti golden sample but i have ower next 1000w.t.c and realy outder is 330w can i run this card with this power?
its official the 260x destroys the 750 ti getting on average 20 fps more
People purposely wanting to use hardware specs or use one synthetic benchmark over another, and totally ignore in-game results, are either doing it out of ignorance or to make them feel better about purchasing the wrong card. If you want to make purchasing decisions based on meaningful data instead of out of ignorance, look for in-game FPS scores at the resolution you intend to play at. There are many in-game scores on Toms Hardware for both of these cards. http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2014-vga-charts/compare,3598.html?prod%5B6943%5D=on&prod%5B6789%5D=on
Stay away from the R7 260X. So many memory clock and black screen problems
comments powered by Disqus