Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti based on its noise and power.
See full details | Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
by techPowerUp!Alongside the Radeon R9 280X and R9 270X, AMD launched its entry-level Radeon R7 260X graphics card, fit for visually-intensive desktops with some mild gaming thrown into the mix.
by techPowerUp!Still, the GTX 750 Ti's reference price is too high at $150, which has other cards offer a better price/performance ratio.
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
8.6 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,500 MHz | vs | 5,400 MHz | More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly higher clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,020 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | vs | 86.4 GB/s | More than 20% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,971.2 GFLOPS | vs | 1,305.6 GFLOPS | More than 50% better floating-point performance | |||
Slightly higher texture rate | 61.6 GTexel/s | vs | 40.8 GTexel/s | More than 50% higher texture rate | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | vs | 1,350 MHz | More than 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
More shading units | 896 | vs | 640 | 256 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 40 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Slightly better bitcoin mining score | 225.27 mHash/s | vs | 173.22 mHash/s | More than 30% better bitcoin mining score | |||
| |||||||
Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 35 | vs | 8.2 | More than 4.2x higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Lower TDP | 60W | vs | 115W | Around 50% lower TDP |
Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
![]() | 7.8 | 9.0 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750 Ti vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750 Ti vs 1030 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750 Ti vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750 Ti vs 950 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$576 | ||
750 Ti vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750 Ti vs 760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs MX150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$364 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$364 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$364 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||