Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 950 LP |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 1,026 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Higher pixel rate | 32.8 GPixel/s | vs | 17.6 GPixel/s | More than 85% higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 115W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 950 LP
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce GTX 950 LP |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Bonaire | GM206 | |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 1,026 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 LP 1 GHz 2 GB | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 896 | 768 | |
| Texture mapping units | 56 | 48 | |
| Render output processors | 16 | 32 | |
| Pixel rate | 17.6 GPixel/s | 32.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 61.6 GTexel/s | 49.2 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971.2 GFLOPS | 1,575.9 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon R7 260X | vs | GeForce GTX 950 LP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | 1,653 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 6,500 MHz | 6,612 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit | |
| Memory | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 105.8 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 115W | 75W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs R7 260X | ||
 | VS | |
| 750 vs R7 260X | ||
 | VS | |
| 7770 vs R7 260X | ||
 | VS | |
| 7850 vs R7 260X | ||
 | VS | |
| R7 360 vs R7 260X | ||
 | VS | |
| 650 Ti vs R7 260X | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 270 vs R7 260X | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1070 | ||
