Radeon R7 260X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,500 MHz | vs | 2,800 MHz | More than 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | More than 2.2x higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 104 GB/s | More than 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| More shading units | 1,600 | vs | 896 | 704 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 56 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 128 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| More compute units | 20 | vs | 14 | 6 more compute units | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon R7 260X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R7 260X | vs | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | ATI | |
| GPU name | Bonaire | M98 | |
| Market | Desktop | Laptop | |
| Clock speed | 1,100 MHz | 500 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | Yes | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 896 | 1,600 | |
| Texture mapping units | 56 | 80 | |
| Render output processors | 16 | 32 | |
| Compute units | 14 | 20 | |
| Pixel rate | 17.6 GPixel/s | 16 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 61.6 GTexel/s | 40 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971.2 GFLOPS | 1,600 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon R7 260X | vs | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | 700 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 6,500 MHz | 2,800 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 512 bit | |
| Memory | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 104 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
