Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 4,000 MHz Around 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 3,128 vs 1,535 More than 2x better PassMark score
Much better sky diver factor score 264.35 vs 2.27 More than 116.5x better sky diver factor score
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 10% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 65% higher memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 61.6 GTexel/s vs 40 GTexel/s Around 55% higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 56 vs 40 16 more texture mapping units
Slightly more compute units 14 vs 10 4 more compute units
Lower TDP 115W vs 190W Around 40% lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 4890

Reasons to consider the
XFX Radeon HD 4890

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 128 GB/s vs 104 GB/s Around 25% higher memory bandwidth
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs HD 4890

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
3,357.58
Radeon HD 4890
3,358.98

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

comments powered by Disqus