GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 5770 Engineering Sample among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
ATi Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample 

GPUBoss recommends the ATi Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample  based on its benchmarks and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,820 vs 2,410 Around 5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 4,800 MHz More than 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 3,128 vs 1,697 Around 85% better PassMark score
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate 40.1 fps vs 29.3 fps More than 35% higher battlefield 3 framerate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s More than 35% higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,971.2 GFLOPS vs 1,360 GFLOPS Around 45% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 61.6 GTexel/s vs 34 GTexel/s More than 80% higher texture rate
Better T-Rex score 3.67 frames/s vs 1.05 frames/s More than 3.5x better T-Rex score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,200 MHz More than 35% higher memory clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 33.7 vs 19.74 More than 70% better fire strike factor score
More texture mapping units 56 vs 40 16 more texture mapping units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,681 vs 805 More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly more compute units 14 vs 10 4 more compute units
Front view of Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 17,844 vs 1,903 Around 9.5x better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 9,992 vs 6,931 Around 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 40 vs 6.8 Around 6x higher crysis 3 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
222.35 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
43.73 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
804.99 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus