0 Comments
| Radeon R7 260X vs HD 6850 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 6850 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 11,820 | vs | 3,640 | Around 3.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 775 MHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 6,500 MHz | vs | 4,000 MHz | Around 65% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 1,625 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | Around 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
Higher texture rate | 61.6 GTexel/s | vs | 37.2 GTexel/s | More than 65% higher texture rate | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,971.2 GFLOPS | vs | 1,488 GFLOPS | More than 30% better floating-point performance | |||
Better T-Rex score | 3.67 frames/s | vs | 1.33 frames/s | More than 2.8x better T-Rex score | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 33.7 | vs | 27 | Around 25% better fire strike factor score | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 15,040 | vs | 1,903 | Around 8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 15,230 | vs | 6,931 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | vs | 104 GB/s | Around 25% higher memory bandwidth | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Slightly higher pixel rate | 24.8 GPixel/s | vs | 17.6 GPixel/s | More than 40% higher pixel rate | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs HD 6850
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 260X
222.35 mHash/s
Radeon HD 6850
139.31 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 260X
43.73 mPixels/s
Radeon HD 6850
13.02 mPixels/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 260X
3,357.58
Radeon HD 6850
3,353.74
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 260X
3,715.1
Radeon HD 6850
3,203.43
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 260X
33.7
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 260X
264.35
Radeon HD 6850
181.77
Battlefield 4
Radeon R7 260X
8.2
FarCry 3
Reviews Word on the street
Radeon R7 260X | vs | HD 6850 | ||
![]() | 7.8 | 9.2 |
---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
R7 260X vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 260X vs 750 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 260X vs 7770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 260X vs 7850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 260X vs R7 360 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 260X vs 650 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 260X vs 7790 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
Guest (12:48 PM, March 10, 2015)
Guest (09:37 AM, April 20, 2014)
Guest (08:50 PM, April 5, 2014)