Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 750 MHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,820 vs 4,880 Around 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 4,800 MHz More than 35% higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 1,200 MHz More than 35% higher memory clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 33.7 vs 26.32 Around 30% better fire strike factor score
Lower TDP 115W vs 186W Around 40% lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 6930

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6930

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 26,350 vs 1,903 More than 13.8x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 19,070 vs 6,931 More than 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 153.6 GB/s vs 104 GB/s Around 50% higher memory bandwidth
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 1,280 vs 896 384 more shading units
More texture mapping units 80 vs 56 24 more texture mapping units
More compute units 20 vs 14 6 more compute units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs HD 6930

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus