GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 260X vs 620 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.7

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R7 260X 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 260X  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 260X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 260X

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,500 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,820 vs 750 More than 15.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 700 MHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 3,128 vs 432 Around 7.2x better PassMark score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 7.2x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,971.2 GFLOPS vs 268.8 GFLOPS More than 7.2x better floating-point performance
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 6,931 vs 2,230 More than 3x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher texture rate 61.6 GTexel/s vs 11.2 GTexel/s More than 5.5x higher texture rate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly better fire strike factor score 33.7 vs 5.23 Around 6.5x better fire strike factor score
Much higher memory clock speed 1,625 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 80% higher memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 17.6 GPixel/s vs 2.8 GPixel/s More than 6.2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 896 vs 96 800 more shading units
Significantly better T-Rex score 3.67 frames/s vs 0.37 frames/s Around 10x better T-Rex score
More texture mapping units 56 vs 16 40 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,681 vs 271 Around 6.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Better manhattan score 3,715.1 vs 1,280.78 Around 3x better manhattan score
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GT 620

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 620

Report a correction
Better 3DMark06 score 4,730 vs 1,903 Around 2.5x better 3DMark06 score
Lower TDP 49W vs 115W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GT 620

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
222.35 mHash/s
GeForce GT 620
17.41 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
43.73 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 620
4.05 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
804.99 frames/s
GeForce GT 620
83.91 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
3,357.58
GeForce GT 620
2,104.68

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 260X
3,715.1
GeForce GT 620
1,280.78

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus