GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 265 vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 265

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 265

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 29.6 GPixel/s vs 16.32 GPixel/s More than 80% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Better video composition score 88.08 frames/s vs 51.74 frames/s More than 70% better video composition score
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 1,024 vs 640 384 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Better fire strike factor score 39.83 vs 33.8 Around 20% better fire strike factor score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 28 vs 20.4 More than 35% higher crysis 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel/s Around 40% higher texture rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,400 MHz More than 5% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 60W vs 150W 2.5x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 265
247.41 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 265
52.49 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 265
1,385.67 frames/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
849.54 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Reviews Word on the street


Showing 21 comments.
I have both cards. GTX 750 Ti SC boosts to ~1250 stock and overclocks to 1400/7500. R7 265 is 925 stock and overclocks to 1100/6000. At max overclocks (mine are fairly average) The R7 265 ends up being about 20% faster. Granted, I'm using both on a 1366x768 monitor, so the 20% is hard to see without the RivaTuner stats overlay on screen.
Well since AMD makes mostly console GPUs and NVIDIA took advantage of that with constantly making every GPU on sale, so now they sold so many that they can price them $20 to $50 cheaper. Remember the 750 ti was about $130 to $170 when released and it saw no price reduction. In which, the 260x(same performance at the time) was $120 and the 265 was $160 so really it WAS a no brainer to go AMD as long as you had a 450 watt power supply instead of a 400 watt or lower for NVIDIA. Same reason the 900 series is killing it right now, their was a rumor that 980 ti was going to be $750 but with the success 700 series and the early 900 series its just i believe Nvidia is really trying to be a monopoly compared to Intel who tries to stay out of AMD's price range as they saw the Pentium g3258 destruction so now they stick pentium that have worse specs than last gens and making i3's above $130.
Yeah well isn't the name of the game PRICE TO PERFORMANCE here? Roughly %15 better performance for $75 more dollars? Not to mention a little looking and a 750 ti is more around $100. I'd get a 750ti if I had $100-125 to spend, and a GTX 960 or even a R9 380 fif $200 to spend. The point here that you all seem to be forgetting is a roughly $100 GPU is almost toe to toe with a $200 GPU.
Nvidia wins SOO hard.
Texture Rate comparison is wrong!
look for this :D
Beats the hell out of me. If I were to only report 1080p someone could claim I was hiding the better performance in 2160p to make the GTX 750 Ti look better. I went more in depth on the 260x vs 750 Ti comparison page in at least one of my posts.
Who the hell uses an R7 265 for gaming at 4K?!
750ti , The texture rate is 82.64 GTexel/s , it wrong , this is 40+ GTexel/s, Check this can search google
Based on 19 games benched on Toms Hardware, it is 8.7% faster in 1080p and 14% faster in 2160p. It is 10.2% faster overall.
Based on 1080p games benched on Toms Hardware, the R7 265 is 9% faster than a GTX 750 Ti.
It is good to see this new GPU and its even better to see that it performs better than the 750ti but i would totally go with the Nvidia, Why? because of performance per watt.
This was the biggest factor for me. The machine I have only had a 350watt power supply. The 750ti ran on the same amount of power as the existing workstation card and didn't need a 6-pin adaptor. That's the primary reason the 750ti is in my machine today.
r7 265 (FTW) all the time <3
Price: MSI R7 265: 149,99$ vs MSI GTX 750 TI: 149,99 (it´s ironic XD) Performance: ZOTAC 750TI vs Shappire R7265 (Nvidia 3 VS AMD 5)
265 obv
Of course the 265 is faster. It's MUCH less power efficient and a larger card, too. I'd take the 750 Ti every time.
R7 265 FTW
the 265 of course. estimate 15% better
comments powered by Disqus