Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 265

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 265

Report a correction
Higher pixel rate 28.8 GPixel/s vs 16.32 GPixel/s More than 75% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 1,024 vs 640 384 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 57.6 GTexel/s Around 45% higher texture rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,400 MHz More than 5% higher memory clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon R7 265  vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R7 265
28.8 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
16.32 GPixel/s
While I wouldn't call it an ideal 1080p card, it still has enough performance for decent gaming at that resolution if you don't mind sacrificing some anti-aliasing or detail levels.
Radeon R7 265 | by techPowerUp!

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R7 265
57.6 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
82.64 GTexel/s
AMD tells us that they expect the Radeon R7 265 to retail at around $150, which is a very competitive price for the card's performance.
Radeon R7 265 | by techPowerUp!

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R7 265
1,843 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1,728 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

The GM107 hence features a total of 640 CUDA cores and 48 TMUs.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | by techPowerUp!

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

At its outermost ring, the GM107 features the GigaThread Engine, a component that marshals data and instructions between the graphics processing cluster (GPC), the raster operations processors (ROPs), the L3 cache, the memory controllers, the bus interface, and the display I/O..
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | by techPowerUp!

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon R7 265  vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti 

9.4
9.0
Sapphire's custom cooler does a good job of keeping the card cool, but I wish it would have been quieter during gaming.
Radeon R7 265

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

Radeon R7 265  vs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Pitcairn GM107
Market Desktop Desktop
Clock speed 900 MHz 1,020 MHz
Turbo clock speed 925 MHz 1,085 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Shading units 1,024 640
Texture mapping units 64 40
Render output processors 32 16
Pixel rate 28.8 GPixel/s 16.32 GPixel/s
Texture rate 57.6 GTexel/s 82.64 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 1,843 GFLOPS 1,728 GFLOPS

memory

Radeon R7 265  vs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 
Memory clock speed 1,400 MHz 1,502 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz 5,400 MHz
Memory bus 256 bit 128 bit
Memory 2,048 MB 2,048 MB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Comments

Showing 8 comments.
This was the biggest factor for me. The machine I have only had a 350watt power supply. The 750ti ran on the same amount of power as the existing workstation card and didn't need a 6-pin adaptor. That's the primary reason the 750ti is in my machine today.
r7 265 (FTW) all the time <3
Price: MSI R7 265: 149,99$ vs MSI GTX 750 TI: 149,99 (it´s ironic XD) Performance: ZOTAC 750TI vs Shappire R7265 http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/radeon-r7-265-vs-geforce-gtx-750-ti-which-is-best-for-1080p-gaming (Nvidia 3 VS AMD 5)
265 obv
THE AMD R7 265 PERFORMS BETTER THAN THE GTX 750 Ti.
Of course the 265 is faster. It's MUCH less power efficient and a larger card, too. I'd take the 750 Ti every time.
R7 265 FTW
the 265 of course. estimate 15% better
comments powered by Disqus