Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 350

Report a correction
Lower TDP 65W vs 90W Around 30% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 950

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,612 MHz vs 4,500 MHz More than 45% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 105.8 GB/s vs 72 GB/s More than 45% higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 32.8 GPixel/s vs 8.4 GPixel/s Around 4x higher pixel rate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Better floating-point performance 1,572.9 GFLOPS vs 806.4 GFLOPS More than 95% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,653 MHz vs 1,125 MHz More than 45% higher memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 49.2 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s More than 95% higher texture rate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
More texture mapping units 48 vs 24 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher turbo clock speed 1,188 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 350 vs GeForce GTX 950

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 350
3,358.42
GeForce GTX 950
3,355.2

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 350
3,640.3
GeForce GTX 950
3,711.68

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus