GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 370 vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

AMD Radeon R7 370

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R7 370

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 370

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 370

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark06 score 8,430 vs 5,378 More than 55% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,898 vs 20,401 More than 25% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,648 vs 3,699 More than 25% better PassMark score
Higher pixel rate 31.2 GPixel/s vs 16.32 GPixel/s More than 90% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 1,024 vs 640 384 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Better video composition score 73.96 frames/s vs 51.74 frames/s Around 45% better video composition score
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,657 vs 1,830 More than 45% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 26.3 fps vs 20.4 fps Around 30% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 55.96 fps vs 46.7 fps Around 20% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Slightly higher metro: last light framerate 37.6 vs 30.9 More than 20% higher metro: last light framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Higher texture rate 82.64 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel/s More than 30% higher texture rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 975 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,400 MHz More than 5% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 60W vs 110W More than 45% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 370 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 370
247.3 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 370
49.98 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 370

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 370

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4


Showing 14 comments.
msi r7 370 + amd a10 7870k apu POWa
after searching i think RX 480 still worth buying than R7 370
i have a 750ti and fx 6300 and get 500 fps in game
It's your cpu, csgo isn't gpu intensive it's cpu intensive
if you have a 144hz screen it makes a big difference, other then that it doesn't matter as long as ur getting 144frames then. depending on the monitor you have will tell you how many frames u need. if ur monitor is a 60hz monitor then you only need 60frames and thats the average screen.
Well you probably have a 60hz monitor, which means that you can't see more than 60fps anyway. Even if your graphic card is so good that your fps meter says 100fps, if your monitor is 60hz that means the monitor is only fast enough to SHOW you 60fps at max. In order to SEE more then 60fps to notice the difference you need a 120hz or 144hz monitor etc.. It DOES make a difference though, running at 120fps or 144fps with a 120hz or 144hz monitor makes things smoother, and also helps you react better, as the more frames you see the more movement is shown to you; so you are able to see someone coming around a corner a quarter of a second sooner perhaps, and that means you can raise your gun a quarter second sooner and shoot a quarter second sooner etc.. which is why pro FPS players use 120hz or 144hz monitors and play on medium settings or something; so they can get a full 120fps or 144fps. There are diminishing returns though, going from 60 to 144 isn't quite as big as from 30 to 60; it is still quite notibeable though. Personally i think anything over around 85hz and 85fps is enough to get the majority of benefit.
Many good cs go players use 144hz monitors so you need more then 144fps ingame to see these 144hz propeley working. Game runs much smoother
I really don't understand why CS:GO players need 250FPS when they play. I can't notice the difference between 60FPS and 400FPS when I play it. Is this because the players need faster reaction times?
hmm weird i got the am r7 370 and people are telling me that they get on ultra settings 250 fps in csgo and i just get around 100-120 fps even if the r7 reks the nvidia in the benchmarks test
damn i will buy this r7
I believe that certain people should stay at the back of the bus.
The 370 will rekt the 750ti
comments powered by Disqus