Winner
AMD Radeon R7 370
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 370 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon R7 370 vs 240 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 370 vs R7 240 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon R7 370GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 4,648 | vs | 966 | More than 4.8x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | Around 6.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher clock speed | 925 MHz | vs | 730 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,996.8 GFLOPS | vs | 499.2 GFLOPS | 4x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 31.2 GPixel/s | vs | 6.24 GPixel/s | 5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher texture rate | 62.4 GTexel/s | vs | 15.6 GTexel/s | 4x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly better fire strike factor score | 37 | vs | 10.89 | Around 3.5x better fire strike factor score | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 320 | 704 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 20 | 44 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 2,657 | vs | 621 | More than 4.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 975 MHz | vs | 780 MHz | 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More compute units | 16 | vs | 5 | 11 more compute units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,715.28 | vs | 1,769.8 | More than 2x better manhattan score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 110W | 3.7x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 370 vs 240
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Radeon R7 370, starting from $3,837
- 4 desktops with the Radeon R7 240, starting from $569
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| R7 240 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 240 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| R7 240 vs 630 | ||
 | VS |  |
| R7 370 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 370 vs 950 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| R7 370 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 370 vs R9 270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
