Winner
AMD Radeon R7 370
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 370 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon R7 370 vs 240 |
Released June, 2015
AMD Radeon R7 370
- 925 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
8.8 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The core clock is maintained at 1050 MHz while the memory operates at a reference clock speed of 5.6 GHz effective.
VS
Released October, 2013
AMD Radeon R7 240
- 730 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
6.3 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)Its bigger brother, the Radeon R7 250 which is based on the Oland XT GPU would feature 384 shaders, upto 2 GB GDDR5 memory along a 128-bit interface and faster clock speeds.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 370 vs R7 240 among Desktop GPUs for under $200
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon R7 370GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 4,648 | vs | 966 | More than 4.8x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 28.8 GB/s | Around 6.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 925 MHz | vs | 730 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,996.8 GFLOPS | vs | 499.2 GFLOPS | 4x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 31.2 GPixel/s | vs | 6.24 GPixel/s | 5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 62.4 GTexel/s | vs | 15.6 GTexel/s | 4x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better fire strike factor score | 37 | vs | 10.89 | Around 3.5x better fire strike factor score | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 320 | 704 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 20 | 44 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 975 MHz | vs | 780 MHz | 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,657 | vs | 621 | More than 4.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More compute units | 16 | vs | 5 | 11 more compute units | |||
| Slightly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 30W | vs | 110W | 3.7x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 370 vs 240
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 1 desktop with the Radeon R7 370, starting from $3,488
- 4 desktops with the Radeon R7 240, starting from $629
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $83 | ||
| R7 240 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 240 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 240 vs 1030 | ||
 | VS |  |
| R7 370 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 370 vs 950 | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 370 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| R7 370 vs R9 270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $347 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $347 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $347 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
