GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 Graphics vs 660 among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 Graphics

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 980 MHz vs 888 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 15W vs 130W 8.7x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 823 MHz vs 720 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Much better manhattan score 12,983.16 vs 2,202.26 Around 6x better manhattan score
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel/s More than 2.5x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 96 vs 32 Three times as many texture mapping units
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 1,003.5 GFLOPS Around 90% better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 7.84 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
More shading units 1,152 vs 512 640 more shading units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 Graphics vs GeForce GTX 660

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660


comments powered by Disqus