GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R7 M260 vs 840M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.9

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R7 M260 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R7 M260  based on its gaming.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon R7 M260

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon R7 M260

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 M260

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 M260

Report a correction
Much higher hitman: absolution framerate 13.4 vs 6.7 2x higher hitman: absolution framerate
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,000 MHz vs 2,002 MHz Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 64 GB/s vs 16.02 GB/s Around 4x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 37.5 fps vs 17.7 fps More than 2x higher diablo III framerate
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 840M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 840M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,359.62 vs 1,688.22 Around 2x better T-Rex score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,029 MHz vs 620 MHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Much higher dead space 3 framerate 24.5 fps vs 21.5 fps Around 15% higher dead space 3 framerate
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,124 MHz vs 715 MHz More than 55% higher turbo clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 10,332 vs 7,810 More than 30% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Slightly better PassMark score 879 vs 653 Around 35% better PassMark score
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 6,627 vs 4,787 Around 40% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better particle simulation score 184.99 mInteraction/s vs 105.33 mInteraction/s More than 75% better particle simulation score
Better cloud gate factor score 10.08 vs 7.44 More than 35% better cloud gate factor score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 M260 vs GeForce 840M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
77.89 mHash/s
GeForce 840M
94.68 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
14.25 mPixels/s
GeForce 840M
22.54 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
1,688.22
GeForce 840M
3,359.62

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
1,718.67
GeForce 840M
3,715.08

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Comments

comments powered by Disqus