Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R7 M260

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R7 M260

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,000 MHz vs 1,600 MHz 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark06 score 1,897 vs 753 More than 2.5x better 3DMark06 score
Higher memory bandwidth 64 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Slightly higher clock speed 620 MHz vs 560 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 4,787 vs 2,789 More than 70% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better particle simulation score 105.33 mInteraction/s vs 33.87 mInteraction/s More than 3x better particle simulation score
More shading units 384 vs 96 288 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 800 MHz 25% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 425M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 2,963.89 vs 1,688.22 More than 75% better T-Rex score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 M260 vs GeForce GT 425M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
77.89 mHash/s
GeForce GT 425M
13.98 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
14.25 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 425M
4.19 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
145.3 frames/s
GeForce GT 425M
161.58 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
1,688.22
GeForce GT 425M
2,963.89

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R7 M260
1,718.67
GeForce GT 425M
2,156.47

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus