0 Comments
| Radeon R7 M260 vs GeForce GT 425M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better 3DMark06 score | 1,897 | vs | 753 | More than 2.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 25.6 GB/s | Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Slightly higher clock speed | 620 MHz | vs | 560 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 4,787 | vs | 2,789 | More than 70% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Better particle simulation score | 105.33 mInteraction/s | vs | 33.87 mInteraction/s | More than 3x better particle simulation score | |||
More shading units | 384 | vs | 96 | 288 more shading units | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 2,963.89 | vs | 1,688.22 | More than 75% better T-Rex score |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R7 M260 vs GeForce GT 425M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M260
77.89 mHash/s
GeForce GT 425M
13.98 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M260
14.25 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 425M
4.19 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M260
145.3 frames/s
GeForce GT 425M
161.58 frames/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M260
1,688.22
GeForce GT 425M
2,963.89
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon R7 M260
1,718.67
GeForce GT 425M
2,156.47
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 M260
8.23
GeForce GT 425M
7.04
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 M260
87.27
GeForce GT 425M
64.35
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon R7 M260
7.44
GeForce GT 425M
9.64